This was a major aspect of reform and could have provided real competition and potentially saved struggling Americans billions. Absolutely inexplicable why any honest politician could have conceivably voted against this.
Pharmaceuticals / Health Products: Top Recipients / Self Explanatory / From Opensecrets.org
Isn't it interesting how the WSJ (in their article: The Copenhagen Concoction) can suddenly latch onto causes they had no sympathy for in the past? In this case, starving children who will go unfed if we just ignore global warming science. How many will starve as the oceans die and climate change disrupts farming? How many will die in the wars over resources? Choosing to feed starving children is not a choice we often see them making.
Climate change is like a sinking ship. Deniers sit on deck and say I don't see any . . .
This video shows the nonsense that passes for logic from the conservative right on the health care issue. Can these people really claim any logical reason for opposing health care?
"The vaccines were developed too quickly. Some ingredients were insufficiently tested," he said.
"But there is worse to come. The vaccine developed by Novartis was produced in a bioreactor from cancerous cells, a technique that had never been used until now."
--Statement of Wolfgan Wodarg of Europe Health Council
